Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

UNITED CANNERY MAINTENANCE, ETC., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. LOCAL80-A, UNITED PACKINGHOUSE WORKERS OF AMERICA, ET AL.,DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

PER CURIAM.

Defendants filed a notice of appeal to the Appellate Division of the Superior Court from two interlocutory orders of the Law Division, one denying a motion for summary judgment and the other requiring one of the defendants and certain witnesses to answer questions propounded to them on the taking of depositions.

The orders sought to be appealed from do not come within any of the classes enumerated in R.R. 2:2-3(a) in which appeals may be taken as of right from interlocutory judgments. The defendants have not obtained leave to appeal as required by subsection (b) of that rule.

The appeal therefore is dismissed.

For dismissal — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING, JACOBS and BRENNAN — 7.

Opposed — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

UNITED CANNERY MAINTENANCE v. LOCAL 80-A
(Oct 18, 1954)