KURTZ v. OREMLAND, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Bernard Hellring argued the cause for the appellants ( Messrs. Greene Hellring, attorneys). Mr. David M. Perskie, Mr. William Elmer Brown, Jr., and Mr. Carl Kisselman argued the cause for the respondents ( Messrs. Perskie and Perskie, and Messrs. Brown and Frank, attorneys).

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Bernard Hellring argued the cause for the appellants ( Messrs. Greene Hellring, attorneys). Mr. David M. Perskie, Mr. William Elmer Brown, Jr., and Mr. Carl Kisselman argued the cause for the respondents ( Messrs. Perskie and Perskie, and Messrs. Brown and Frank, attorneys).

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

JOSEPH KURTZ AND DAVID BUSCH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. BENJAMIN OREMLAND,PEARL OREMLAND, DAVID LEWIS AND ALBERT M. GREENFIELD CO., A CORPORATION OFNEW JERSEY, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.JOSEPH KURTZ AND DAVID BUSCH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Haneman in the court below. 33 N.J. Super. 443 ( Ch. Div. 1954).

For affirmance — Justices HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD and BURLING — 4.

For reversal — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices JACOBS and BRENNAN — 3.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.