Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

KARL E. DOWD a., Adm'rs v. EARLE B. MOORE a. SAME

The lien provided by the workmen's compensation law (Laws 1947, c. 266, s. 12, as amended by Laws 1949, c. 160) in favor of an employer does not attach to the proceeds of recovery or settlement of an action by the administrator of the employee against third persons to recover damages arising out of the employee's death.

The settlement of common-law actions in fatal injury cases does not require the approval of either the Court or the Commissioner of Labor and the proceeds less the statutory expenses are to be distributed in accordance with R. L., c. 355, s. 14.

DUNCAN, J.

The questions transferred without ruling are controlled by the decision in Gagne v. Greenhouses, 99 N.H. 292, argued and considered with this case and decided this day. The lien provided by Laws 1947, c. 266, s. 12, as amended by Laws 1949, c. 160, in favor of an employer does not attach to the proceeds of recovery or settlement of an action by the administrator of the employee against third persons to recover damages arising out of the employee's death. Settlement of such an action does not require the approval of either the Court or the Commissioner of Labor as provided by the same section.

It follows that the employer in this case has no lien upon the proceeds of the settlements of the law actions, or upon any share of Robert E. Farland in the balance thereof available for distribution under R. L., c. 355, s. 14. Neither the Court nor the Commissioner has jurisdiction to approve the settlements or to order any part of the proceeds thereof paid to the defendant Textron, Inc. or its insurer. The proceeds are to be distributed in accordance with R. L., c. 355, s. 14, after payment of the expenses requiring approval by the probate court, including such counsel fees as are properly "expenses of recovery."

Since section 12 of the Workmen's Compensation Law is inapplicable, questions raised by certain of the parties with respect to constitutionality of the section require no consideration. This is likewise true of the issues presented by the exceptions of the employer and its insurer to the rulings of the Trial Court.

Remanded.

All concurred.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DOWD v. MOORE
(Dec 15, 1954)