Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

HORLBECK ET AL. v. WALTHER.

1. APPEAL AND ERROR — Rules — No Judgment. In an action to obtain a court order setting aside a foreclosure sale of property, restoring the property to plaintiff, and for damages, it is held, that the Rule 112 (a) R.C.P. Colo., requiring the inclusion or the judgment in the record is mandatory, and without a compliance therewith, there is nothing for the Supreme Court to review.

PER CURIAM:

NOWHERE in the record submitted by plaintiffs in error does it appear that a judgment was entered against them in the trial court. We find original and amended findings of fact by the trial judge and direction to the clerk for the entry of judgment, but no such judgment was ever entered of record in the trial court. Rule 112 (a) R.C.P. Colo., requiring the inclusion of the judgment in the record is mandatory, and without a compliance therewith there is nothing for this court to review, Savageau, Inc. v. Larsen, 117 Colo. 229, 185 P.2d 1012; Howard v. American Law Book Co., 121 Colo. 5, 212 P.2d 1006. The writ of error is, therefore, dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HORLBECK v. WALTHER
(Jan 17, 1955)