Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE of Arizona, Appellant, v. Cal

PHELPS, Justice.

With the exception that a different party defendant is involved and different persons are alleged to have been defrauded and different amounts procured as a result thereof the information, the motion to quash, and the ruling of the trial court thereon are all identical with those set forth in State v. Freeman, 78 Ariz. 286, 279 P.2d 443, and the opinion therein applies with equal force to the instant case.

It is therefore ordered that the order to quash the information and the order directing the county attorney to institute new proceedings before a justice of the peace are set aside and the cause is remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the views expressed in that opinion.

LA PRADE, C.J., and UDALL, WINDES, and STRUCKMEYER, Jr., JJ., concurring.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. FREEMAN
(Jan 26, 1955)