Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. ARTHUR J. FROMEN, Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The appeal in this case was taken July 22, 1954, and was reached for argument on March 4, 1955. During the intervening period of more than seven months, no application was made for enlargement of time for argument of the appeal, as required by section 536 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, despite the fact that appellant was advised of the necessity of compliance therewith. No adequate reason has been given for this failure. In People v. Solomon ( 296 N.Y. 85) we cautioned the Bar concerning the necessity of observing the provisions of this statute. The appeal should be dismissed, on the court's own motion.

CONWAY, Ch. J., DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE, JJ., concur.

Appeal dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. FROMEN
(Mar 11, 1955)