AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

HERSHEL CALIFORNIA FRUIT PRODUCTS COMPANY, Inc., a corporation, et al., Appellants, v. HUNT FOODS, Inc., a corporation, Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant has moved to dismiss its appeal from an order of the District Court denying it a preliminary injunction. 111 F. Supp. 732. The ground for dismissal is alleged to be that the motion for a preliminary injunction has become moot. Appellee resists dismissal, contending that this court should retain the appeal and affirm the order of the District Court with directions to dismiss the action. We think the ends of justice would be best served by dismissing the appeal and permitting the trial court to hear and determine the case on the merits.

Appeal dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HERSHEL CALIF. FRUIT PRODUCTS v. HUNT FOODS
(Apr 22, 1955)