Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

WILLIAM E. HALLADA, JR., v. GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY., Reported in 72 N.W.2d 74. Certiorari denied, 350 U.S. 874, 76 S.Ct. 119, 100 L. ed. ___.

Judgment affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from a judgment. The case was here before on an appeal from an order denying defendant's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or in the alternative for a new trial. Our opinion filed February 25, 1955, affirmed the order appealed from if plaintiff within ten days after the filing of the remittitur in the lower court shall file his written consent to a reduced verdict in the sum of $105,000. Hallada v. G. N. Ry. 244 Minn. 81, 69 N.W.2d 673. Within the ten-day period plaintiff filed his written consent to a reduction of the verdict. For the reasons given in the previous opinion the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HALLADA v. GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY
(Jun 10, 1955)