AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of the Application of INTER-CITY ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellant, to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum in a Proceeding Entitled THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK v. JOHN DOE. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent.

Per Curiam.

Inasmuch as this application to quash a subpoena duces tecum was made in the Supreme Court, it is a civil proceeding, and is accordingly appealable ( People v. "Doe" [ Byk], 247 App. Div. 324, affd. 272 N.Y. 473; Matter of Ryan [ Hogan], 306 N.Y. 11; Civ. Prac. Act, § 588, subd. 1, par. [a]).

The Appellate Division has dismissed the appeal, but in its opinion stated that if it "had jurisdiction to entertain the appeal on the merits, it would affirm the order". We agree that the Special Term order should be affirmed ( Matter of Manning v. Valente, 272 App. Div. 358, affd. 297 N.Y. 681; Matter of Mohawk Overall Co., 210 N.Y. 474, motion to dismiss granted 235 U.S. 685).

Accordingly, the order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and that of Special Term affirmed, with directions to Special Term to fix a new return date.

CONWAY, Ch. J., DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE, JJ., concur.

Ordered accordingly.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF INTER-CITY ASSOCIATES, INC. v. DOE
(Jun 10, 1955)