Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

ELDON A. PETERSON, APPELLANT, v. JOE VAK ET AL., APPELLEES.

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION

BOSLAUGH, J.

Appellees in a motion for rehearing contend that the opinion of this court, Peterson v. Vak, ante p. 450, 70 N.W.2d 436, incorrectly ordered the district court "to render and enter a judgment in the cause in harmony with this opinion."

This is an equity case. A motion of appellees for a dismissal of the case for insufficiency of the evidence of appellant was made at the conclusion of the evidence of appellant. The motion was by the trial court sustained and the case was dismissed. The contention of appellees in the respect above stated is correct and the words "with directions to render and enter a judgment in the cause in harmony with this opinion" should be and they are deleted from the last paragraph of the opinion. Lucas v. Lucas, 138 Neb. 252, 292 N.W. 729. There should be and there is substituted in the place of the above deleted part of the last paragraph of the opinion the following words: "for further proceedings according to law."

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PETERSON v. VAK
(Jul 1, 1955)