AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL and PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The facts found by the trial judge in this case appear to be amply supported by the evidence, and his legal analysis of the problem is sound and justifies his conclusions of law.

On the grounds and for the reasons stated in its opinion, Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul Pacific Railroad Company v. Northern Pacific Railway Company, D.C.W.D.Washington, 120 F. Supp. 710, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NORTHERN PAC. v. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL
(Sep 21, 1955)