Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

STATE v. NORMAN LEE MINTZ STATE

Crime Against Nature 2: Criminal Law 11, 62a — An attempt to commit the offense defined by G.S. 14-177 is an infamous act within the meaning of G.S. 14-3, and therefore sentence to the State's prison is within the limitations permitted by law.

Two criminal prosecutions under bill of indictment which charges that the defendants did feloniously commit the crime against nature.

The two causes were consolidated for trial, and the court submitted the evidence to the jury on the issue only of attempt to commit the crime against nature. There was a verdict of guilty as to each defendant.

From judgments pronounced on the verdicts the defendants appealed.

PER CURIAM.

G.S. 14-177 defines the crime against nature as an "abominable and detestable" crime, and we held in S. v. Spivey, 213 N.C. 45, 195 S.E. 1, that an attempt to commit the crime thus defined is an infamous act within the meaning of G.S. 14-3. We still adhere to that decision. Hence the sentence imposed in the court below was within the limitations permitted by law.

The other exceptive assignments of error present no substantial question which requires discussion. They fail to point out prejudicial error. Therefore, in the trial below we find

No error.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. MINTZ
(Oct 1, 1955)