Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

HOBSON COLLIER AND LOUISE COLLIER, HIS WIFE, AND HOBSON C. KING AND BLONNIE B. KING, HIS WIFE, PETITIONERS, v. CITY OF HOMESTEAD, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, RESPONDENT.

DREW, Chief Justice.

The sole question presented by the petition for certiorari in this case is whether the lower court erred in denying plaintiffs' motion for a summary final decree. To have granted the motion for summary final decree would have resulted in a judicial determination that the zoning ordinances of the City of Homestead were invalid and unenforceable.

The burden of making error clearly appear is upon the petitioners. They have failed to carry this burden by virtue of which the petition for certiorari is denied.

This denial of the petition for certiorari shall not be construed as passing upon any of the issues in the litigation and decides only that no error has been made to appear on the basis of which the order sought to be reviewed could be disturbed. Compare State Road Department v. Lewis, Fla., 79 So.2d 699, text 700.

TERRELL, ROBERTS and BUFORD, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

COLLIER v. CITY OF HOMESTEAD
(Sep 21, 1955)