Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

STATE v. CALVIN SPENCER SMITH.

Appeal and Error 38 — Where the Supreme Court is evenly divided in opinion, the decision of the lower court will be affirmed without becoming a precedent.

Criminal prosecution upon a warrant issued out of Recorder's Court of Caldwell County, on affidavit charging that defendant did on 3 July, 1954, operate a motor vehicle upon the public highways of the State of North Carolina after operator's license being revoked, heard on original warrant in Superior Court on appeal thereto by defendant from judgment of Judge of said Recorder's Court dated 21 January, 1955.

Plea: Not guilty.

Verdict: Guilty as charged in said warrant.

Judgment: Pronounced.

Defendant excepts thereto and appeals therefrom to the Supreme Court, and assigns error.

PER CURIAM.

The Court being evenly divided in opinion as to whether error prejudicial to defendant is shown in the record on this appeal, Higgins, J., not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed without becoming a precedent. Cole v. R. R., 211 N.C. 591, 191 S.E. 353; Allen v. Ins. Co., 211 N.C. 736, 190 S.E. 735, and cases cited. See also Johnston v. Paper Co., 214 N.C. 828, 199 S.E. 20; Toxey v. Meggs, 216 N.C. 798, 4 S.E.2d 513; Howard v. Coach Co., 216 N.C. 799, 4 S.E.2d 616; Whitehurst v. Anderson, 228 N.C. 787, 44 S.E.2d 358; S. v. Brown, 242 N.C. 602, 89 S.E.2d 157; Refrigerator Co. v. Davenport, 242 N.C. 603, 89 S.E.2d 153; Railway v. Railway, ante, 110, and numerous others.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. SMITH
(Nov 1, 1955)