Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ROSSITER, Administrator, v. PITT et al.

TOWNSEND, J.

A judgment sustaining any or all demurrers to a petition and allowing time for amendment is not subject to exception or review. Code § 81-1001 as amended (Ga. L. 1952, p. 243; Aiken v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 88 Ga. App. 131 ( 76 S.E.2d 141); Cates v. Owens, 87 Ga. App. 270 ( 73 S.E.2d 345); Community Theatres Co. v. Burney, 87 Ga. App. 165 ( 73 S.E.2d 104); Barron v. Foster, 87 Ga. App. 119 ( 73 S.E.2d 102); Thornton v. Courvoisier, 90 Ga. App. 26 ( 81 S.E.2d 842). The amendment of 1953 to Code § 81-1001 (Ga. L. 1953, p. 82), did not change this rule. Adams v. Ricks, 91 Ga. App. 494 (1b) ( 86 S.E.2d 329). It follows that the writ of error to a judgment overruling general and special demurrers and allowing the plaintiff fifteen days for amendment is premature and must be

Dismissed. Gardner, P. J., and Carlisle, J., concur.

DECIDED NOVEMBER 8, 1955 — REHEARING DENIED NOVEMBER 17, 1955.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ROSSITER v. PITT
(Nov 8, 1955)