Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

BILLMAN ET AL., APPELLEES v. MCPHERSON ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Township zoning — Prohibiting trailer camp in business district — Motel permitted in same area — Residential requirements as to area, frontage, depth, set-back lines — Conflict with state law — Discrimination — Inviolability of private property — Police power — Presumption of validity of resolution — Burden of proof — Due process — Equal protection — Section 519.02, Revised Code — Section 3733.01 et seq., Revised Code — Section 19, Article I, Constitution — Section 1, Article XIV, Amendments, U.S. Constitution.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, BELL and TAFT, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BILLMAN v. MCPHERSON
(Nov 23, 1955)