Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Defendant in Error, vs. WILLARD RAINEY, Plaintiff in Error.

Mr. CHIEF JUSTICE HERSHEY delivered the opinion of the court:

The plaintiff in error, Willard Rainey, herein called defendant, seeks the reversal of a judgment of the criminal court of Cook County, which upon his plea of guilty found him guilty of murder and sentenced him to 45 years in the penitentiary, said sentence to run consecutively to a sentence of seven years previously imposed on the defendant for the crime of rape.

Appearing pro se, the defendant relies solely upon the common-law record, having filed no bill of exceptions. He asserts that the imposition of cumulative sentences was unauthorized by law and deprived him of rights guaranteed by the Illinois and Federal constitutions. However, it has long been the rule in this State that a court may, in its discretion, impose consecutive sentences where the accused has committed separate and distinct offenses. See, for example, People v. Vraniak, 5 Ill.2d 384, and People v. Carroll, 1 Ill.2d 359. Thus, the imposition of sentence upon defendant's plea of guilty to the crime of murder, whereby such sentence was made consecutive to that imposed upon his rape conviction, did not constitute error.

The judgment of the criminal court of Cook County is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

THE PEOPLE v. RAINEY
(Nov 23, 1955)