SCHERR v. MEADOW GOLD ICE CREAM COMPANY | 228 F.2d 54 | D.C. Cir. | Judgment | Law

ONOFF
Text Highlighter
Bookmark
PDF
Share
Report a problem

CITATION CODES

Equivalent Citations

DOCKET NO.

No. 12432.

ATTORNEY(S)

Mr. Melvin M. Feldman, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Maxwell A. Ostrow, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for

Mr. Joseph S. McCarthy, Washington, D.C., for appellees Meadow Gold Ice Cream Co.

Beatrice

Mr. John R. Daily, Washington, D.C., with whom

H. Mason Welch, J. Harry Welch, Edward F. Colladay, D.C. Colladay,

J. Richard Earle, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, submitted for appellees the Second

Bank of Washington

Maurice S.

JUDGES

Henry White Edgerton

George Thomas Washington

Walter Maximillian Bastian

ACTS

No Acts

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

D.C. Cir.

SCHERR v. MEADOW GOLD ICE CREAM COMPANY

(Dec 1, 1955) Copy Cite

228 F.2d 54

Case Information

CITATION CODES

DOCKET NO.

No. 12432.

ATTORNEY(S)

Mr. Melvin M. Feldman, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Maxwell A. Ostrow, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for

Mr. Joseph S. McCarthy, Washington, D.C., for appellees Meadow Gold Ice Cream Co.

Beatrice

Mr. John R. Daily, Washington, D.C., with whom

H. Mason Welch, J. Harry Welch, Edward F. Colladay, D.C. Colladay,

J. Richard Earle, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, submitted for appellees the Second

Bank of Washington

Maurice S.

JUDGES

Henry White Edgerton

George Thomas Washington

Walter Maximillian Bastian

ACTS

No Acts

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

Rose SCHERR et al., Appellants, v. MEADOW GOLD ICE CREAM COMPANY, a Corporation, et al., Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff was injured by falling partly through a floor in leased premises. She sued the trustees of the deceased landlord's estate, and also the lessors of a freezer that had just been removed from the place where the accident occurred. The District Court directed a verdict for the defendants. We find no error affecting substantial rights.

Affirmed.

This is a paid feature.
Please subscribe to download the judgment.

Legend

Size = Directly proportional to the number of citations

Color = Jurisdiction U.S. Supreme Court State Supreme Court Court of Appeals District Courts

Line Incoming = Cited by Outgoing = Cites

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

Copy Textarea