Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Lorenzo ALEMAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

The conviction is for contributing to the delinquency of a minor; the punishment, 90 days in jail.

In view of our disposition of this case a statement of the facts will be omitted.

Attorneys for the state confess error in this cause and in doing so agree with the contention of the appellant that the complaint and information are void because the jurat on the complaint shows that the oath of the affiant was administered by one person in the name of another.

The jurat on the complaint shows that the oath was administered to the affiant in the name of Jim Bates, County Attorney, Hidalgo County, Texas; Criminal District Attorney, Hidalgo County, Texas, by Raul L. Longoria, Assistant.

The oath to the affiant under the facts here presented cannot be legally administered by the assistant in the name of his principal, and for that reason the complaint herein is void, as well as the information based thereon. 12 Tex.Jur. 585, sec. 258; Stalcup v. State, 99 Tex.Crim. R., 269 S.W. 1044.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ALEMAN v. STATE
(Dec 7, 1955)