AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

AUTO FINANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Tax Court holding that the intercorporate transactions there under review, by which the taxpayer corporation disposed of its majority interest in the stock of two corporations to the minority stockholders, resulted in capital gain taxable as such and were not taxable dividends for which taxpayer would have been entitled to credit allowance under 26 U.S.C. § 26(b). The facts are fully and correctly set forth in the opinion of the Tax Court and need not be repeated here. See 24 T.C. ___. We think that the decision of the Tax Court was correct for reasons adequately stated in its opinion and that nothing need be added thereto.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

AUTO FINANCE CO. v. COMMR. OF INTERNAL REVENUE
(Jan 13, 1956)