Appeals — Review — Refusing new trial — Automobile case.
In this action in trespass in which it appeared that plaintiff while walking across the highway was struck by automobile A which had been struck in the rear by automobile B, and the primary issue of fact was whether A was moving or had stopped and was pushed forward by B, and the jury returned a verdict only against the operator of B, it was Held, in the circumstances, that there was no error in refusing to grant a new trial.
OPINION PER CURIAM, January 12, 1956:
The judgments in the above captioned cases are affirmed on the opinion of Judge MILNER.