Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Edward NIEWINSKI, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal from the district court's judgment of conviction upon a jury verdict finding the appellant guilty of violating 18 U.S.C.A. § 659, and of having unlawfully conspired to violate said section, was heard upon the record, briefs, and argument of counsel for the parties,

And the court being of the opinion that there was substantial credible evidence to support the jury's verdict, and that therefore the trial court did not err in overruling appellant's motion for a judgment of acquittal; and the court also being of the opinion that in instructing the jury the trial court committed no error prejudicial to the appellant;

It is ordered that the judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NIEWINSKI v. UNITED STATES
(Feb 18, 1956)