Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

JACOBY v. JACOBY.

HEAD, Justice.

In the present case the trial court overruled the defendant's general demurrer and certain grounds of his special demurrers and sustained one ground of special demurrer. The court allowed the plaintiff fifteen days to amend, and within this period the plaintiff filed an amendment. After the expiration of the time for amendment no further adjudication was made by the court as to the sufficiency of the petition. The defendant in a direct bill of exceptions excepts to the judgment overruling his general grounds of demurrer. Held:

"Where the court sustains any or all demurrers to pleading, and allows time for the filing of an amendment, such judgment or order shall not be subject to exception or review, but the court shall render a judgment on the sufficiency of the pleadings after the expiration of the time allowed for amendment which shall supersede the judgment allowing time for amendment." Ga. L. 1952, p. 243 (Code, Ann. Supp., § 81-1001). The trial court having rendered no judgment on the sufficiency of the pleadings after the expiration of the time allowed for amendment, and after the amendment filed by the plaintiff, the ruling on the demurrers here excepted to can not be reviewed in this court. Myers v. Grant, 212 Ga. 182 ( 91 S.E.2d 335); Adams v. Ricks, 91 Ga. App. 494, 498 ( 86 S.E.2d 329); Norton v. Hamilton, 92 Ga. App. 2 ( 87 S.E.2d 442).

Writ of error dismissed. All the Justices concur, except Wyatt, P. J., not participating.

ARGUED FEBRUARY 14, 1956 — DECIDED MARCH 12, 1956.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

JACOBY v. JACOBY
(Mar 12, 1956)