Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE v. HALE, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court — Dismissal sua sponte — No debatable constitutional question involved — Criminal law — Operation of motor vehicle while intoxicated — Section 4511.19, Revised Code — Statutory construction — Change in language of statute — Section 4301.01, Revised Code — Definition of intoxicating liquor — Claim sections in pari materia — Comment of trial court at conclusion of charge — Improper form of verdict submitted — Verdict returned, corrected after deliberations resumed — Fair trial — Equal protection of the laws — Section 10, Article I, Constitution.

Per Curiam.

It is ordered and adjudged, sua sponte, that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, BELL and TAFT, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

THE STATE OF OHIO v. HALE
(Mar 7, 1956)