AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

BARRICINI, INC., et al., Appellants, v. BARRICINI SHOES, INC., et al., Respondents.

In an action to restrain the use of the name "Barricini" by respondents and for other relief, the appeal is from an order denying appellants' motion to restrain such use during the pendency of the action. Order affirmed, without costs. There was no showing by appellants of such irreparable injury and such a clear right to the relief demanded as would warrant the granting of a temporary injunction affording them substantially all the relief which they could obtain if they were successful after trial. (Cf. Clark v. King Bro. Pub. Co., 40 App. Div. 405, 408; Weiss v. Herlihy, 23 App. Div. 608, 612, and Tru Val Manufactures v. Tru-Valu Corner, 1 Misc.2d 844.) Nolan, P.J., Wenzel, Murphy, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BARRICINI, INC. v. BARRICINI SHOES, INC
(Mar 26, 1956)