Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

HENRY TATE POOLE, SR., PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. ARVIS E. WHITMAN ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

GLADNEY, Judge.

This appeal presents a companion case to that of Loe v. Whitman, La.App., 87 So.2d 217.

The two cases were consolidated for trial in the District Court and the issues presented herein are the same as in the case heretofore decided. The question presented is as to the dismissal of appellants' appeal for failure to deposit a filing fee as required by Rule No. 3 of the rules of this court.

For the reasons set forth in Loe v. Whitman, the motion to dismiss the appeal is sustained, the appeal is dismissed, and the record ordered returned to the District Court for further proceedings, the costs incurred upon this appeal to await the final termination of the case.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

POOLE v. WHITMAN
(Apr 19, 1956)