Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

JOHN HEIDEL, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. WALLACE TIERNAN,RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Conlon in the court below.

For affirmance — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING, JACOBS and BRENNAN — 7.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HEIDEL v. WALLACE TIERNAN
(Apr 23, 1956)