Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Action for libel — Newspaper account of arrest — Privileged publication — Statutory construction — Section 2317.05, Revised Code — Constitutionality — Section 16, Article I, Constitution — Section 1, Article XIV, Amendments, U.S. Constitution — Necessity of showing malice — Presumption and burden of proof — Evidence.
Per Curiam.
It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, BELL and TAFT, JJ., concur.