Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PENNSYLVANIA RD. CO., APPELLANT v. SCIOTO-SANDUSKY CONSERVANCY DISTRICT, APPELLEE; DUNN, AUD., ET AL., APPELLANTS. (Two cases.)

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Conservancy districts — Tax illegally levied and collected — Remedies — Section 2723.01 et seq., Revised Code — Class action — By taxpayer to enjoin collection of taxes — To recover taxes illegally collected — Refund denied — Waiver of objections to validity of tax — Uniform Tax Levy Law — Section 5705.01 et seq., Revised Code — Section 2, Article XII, Constitution.

Per Curiam.

It is ordered and adjudged that these appeals as of right be, and the same hereby are, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeals dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART and TAFT, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PENNSYL. RD. CO. v. SCIOTO-SANDUSKY CD, D, AUC
(Jul 5, 1956)