Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE v. TANNYHILL, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court — Dismissal sua sponte — No debatable constitutional question involved — Criminal law — First degree murder — Refusal to grant change of venue — Evidence — Confession — Admissibility — Photographs — State's witnesses in courtroom during argument — Instructions as to parole — Section 10, Article I, Constitution — Articles V and VI, Amendments, U.S. Constitution — Section 1, Article XIV, Amendments, U.S. Constitution.

Per Curiam.

It is ordered and adjudged, sua sponte, that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, BELL and TAFT, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

THE STATE OF OHIO v. TANNYHILL
(Jul 5, 1956)