AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

JOSEPH MALUS, Respondent, v. SPERRY-RAND CORPORATION, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. There was error in the charge respecting the failure to call one Haley, but we think the error was not of sufficient consequence to warrant reversal of the judgment and the granting of a new trial. We may not consider the question of privilege since the defendant did not take the necessary steps to develop the evidence or require the submission of the question to the jury by way of request or exception.

Concur — Peck, P.J., Breitel, Cox, Frank and Bastow, JJ. [See post, p. 967.]

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MALUS v. SPERRY-RAND CORPORATION
(Nov 7, 1956)