Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

INDUSTRIAL PROTESTANTS, APPELLANTS v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES.

Public Utilities Commission — Gas rates — Application for increase — Rate fixing a legislative function — Delegation to commission with standards for guidance — Commission's orders not interfered with by courts, when.

Per Curiam.

The sole issue before this court as stated by appellants is whether the commission "has exercised proper judgment" within the scope of Section 4909.15, Revised Code, so as to fix rates that are not unreasonable, if not confiscatory, to the industrial consumers served by Manufacturers.

Rate fixing is a legislative function and as regards service such as is furnished by Manufacturers has been delegated to the Public Utilities Commission.

That the commission acted in accordance with the applicable statutory provisions is not questioned. The commission, after finding the rates being charged are inadequate, approved schedules representing its own judgment based on evidence before it and an exercise of its sound discretion.

The orders of the commission are affirmed on authority of Citizens Gas Users Assn. v. Public Utilities Commission, ante, 536.

Orders affirmed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, BELL and TAFT, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IND. PROTESTANTS v. P.U.C
(Nov 21, 1956)