AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

HY HILZEN, Appellant, v. UNIVERSAL RESTAURANT CO., INC., et al., Defendants, and SAMMY KAY, Respondent

Per Curiam.

The defendant having failed for more than two years to comply with an order of the court, later affirmed by this tribunal, permitting him to open his default, it was improper to vacate the judgment and extend defendant's time to comply with the conditions of the prior order. Such delay was not excused because the judgment was not served on the defendant personally, service upon his attorneys being sufficient.

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion denied.

HOFSTADTER, AURELIO and TILZER, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HILZEN v. UNIVERSAL RESTAURANT CO., INC
(Dec 20, 1956)