Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BERT E. KALAN, Appellant.

Per Curiam.

When this appellant filed his appeal, as of right, in the court below it was apparent that he was penniless, and unable to employ counsel or to pay for a transcript of the trial minutes; that he was in prison and physically unable to inspect the transcript of the minutes which had been filed in the Clerk's office of Queens County pursuant to section 456 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. While we do not decide that failure to appoint counsel will always constitute a deprivation of constitutional rights, we nonetheless hold that, under the circumstances of this case, refusal to assign counsel upon defendant's request prevented an effective use of the right to appeal in violation of the constitutional guarantees of due process and equal protection. (N.Y. Const., art. I, §§ 6, 11.)

The judgment should be reversed and the appeal remitted to the Appellate Division for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.

CONWAY, Ch. J., DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. KALAN
(Jan 24, 1957)