Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

NICHOLAS DAKIS, Respondent, et al., Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant

Per Curiam.

The warrant was issued at a time when plaintiff was knowingly in default in the payment of his fine. The payment of the fine after the issuance of the warrant did not render the warrant void. The arresting officer was a mere ministerial employee confronted with a directive for the arrest of the plaintiff and in obeying it he did not subject himself or the municipality to an action for false arrest and imprisonment. ( Nastasi v. State of New York, 275 App. Div. 534, affd. 300 N.Y. 473; Fishbein v. State of New York, 204 Misc. 151, affd. 282 App. Div. 600; see, also, Vittorio v. St. Regis Paper Co., 239 N.Y. 148; Mudge v. State of New York, 271 App. Div. 1039.)

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.

HECHT, AURELIO and TILZER, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DAKIS v. CITY OF NEW YORK
(Feb 14, 1957)