AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of MICHAEL J. QUILL, Appellant, against COUNTY COURT OF KINGS COUNTY et al., Respondents.

Order denying an application for an order of prohibition unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. In our opinion, the indictment involved in this proceeding charges the crime of publishing a libel under sections 1340 and 1343 of the Penal Law, of which the County Court of Kings County has jurisdiction by virtue of the provisions of sections 138 and 134 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Cf. People v. Hudson Val. Constr. Co., 217 N.Y. 172; Matter of Kowalsky, 73 Cal. 120.) Jurisdiction is properly in Kings County, also, by reason of the allegations in the indictment that appellant procured, instigated and caused the defamatory statement to be published in that county. ( Cuvillier v. State of New York, 250 N.Y. 258; Penal Law, § 2.) The application, therefore, was properly denied on the merits. In any event, the denial was proper in the exercise of discretion. ( Matter of Polansky v. Sobel, 285 App. Div. 117 8.)

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF QUILL v. COUNTY COURT OF KINGS COUNTY
(Feb 11, 1957)