Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

NAYLOR NAYLOR COMPANY AND TRANSCONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, PETITIONERS, v. EMIL MALKA AND THE FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to quash the petition for writ of certiorari in this cause has been duly made upon the ground that the order of the full commission sought to be reviewed here does not possess the element of finality which is a prerequisite to judicial review. Upon consideration of said motion and after argument of counsel, the court is of the view that there has been no final administrative determination of the matters in controversy and that, therefore, the motion to quash should be and the same is hereby granted.

TERRELL, C.J., and HOBSON, DREW and THORNAL, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NAYLOR NAYLOR COMPANY v. MALKA
(Feb 13, 1957)