Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

HAROLD NORROD v. STATE OF TENNESSEE

COURTS.

The Supreme Court does not have jurisdiction to hear a direct appeal from the juvenile court. T.C.A. secs. 37-235, 37-273.

FROM OVERTON

MR. JUSTICE TOMLINSON delivered the opinion of the Court.Page 578

Norrod was convicted in 1956 in the Overton County Juvenile Court of involuntary manslaughter, and sentenced to one year in the State Training and Agricultural School. His appeal in error is to this Court.

By Chapter 177 of the Acts of 1955, Section 37-273, Code Supplement, appeal from the judgment of a Juvenile Court is to the Circuit Court. That was the law prior thereto. Code Section 37-235, and Doster v. State, 195 Tenn. 535, 260 S.W.2d 279. The only difference was in the manner and time in getting in Circuit Court. Hence, this Court does not have jurisdiction in the present status of this case. It must, therefore, dismiss the appeal in error, being without an alternative. State v. Bockman, 139 Tenn. 422, 427-428, 201 S.W. 741.

The foregoing mistake is apparently a very natural one for lawyers and Courts to make. It was made by this Court in Childress v. State, 133 Tenn. 121, 179 S.W. 643. See State v. Bockman, supra.

Appeal dismissed with costs adjudged against Norrod.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NORROD v. STATE
(Mar 8, 1957)