Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of ARCHER S. DREW, JR., et al., Appellants, against STATE LIQUOR AUTHORITY, Respondent.

Per Curiam.

If, in connection with appellants' petition for a transfer of their liquor store and the subsequent proceeding, there was irregularity in vital matters, illegality or conduct tantamount to fraud, then, the principle of administrative finality may not here be invoked or applied. On the other hand, if no such irregularity, illegality or fraud were present, the State Liquor Authority lacked power to reverse its original determination approving the application. Consequently, under the circumstances of this case, we refrain from considering the decisive effect of the Authority's initial determination, as well as the problem of administrative finality, until after the hearing, directed by the Appellate Division, shall have been held.

The order should be affirmed.

CONWAY, Ch. J., DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF DREW v. STATE LIQ. AUTH
(Apr 12, 1957)