Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

Hirsch, Appellant, v. Bunker Hill Mutual Insurance Co.

Practice — Execution — Staying — Insurance — Suspended insurance company — Insurance Department Act — Act of March 22, 1956, P. L. 1328.

The Act of March 22, 1956, P. L. 1328, amending the Insurance Department Act of May 17, 1921, P. L. 789, § 502 (which provides that ". . . no action at law or equity shall be commenced or prosecuted nor shall any judgment be entered against nor shall any execution or attachment be issued or prosecuted against the suspended company . . . or against its property, in any court of this Commonwealth") is applicable to an action against an insurance company instituted after the effective date of the amendment even though the business of the insurance company was suspended by the Insurance Commissioner prior to the effective date of the amendment.

OPINION PER CURIAM, May 27, 1957:

The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of Judge REIMEL of the court below, reported in 8 Pa. D. C.2d 259.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HIRSCH v. BUNKER HILL MUT. INS. CO
(May 27, 1957)