AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

ANNIE BRENNER, Respondent, v. THE J.J. BRENNER OYSTER COMPANY, Appellant. THE J.J. BRENNER OYSTER COMPANY, Appellant,

PER CURIAM.

Upon a rehearing En Banc, a majority of the court adhere to the En Banc opinion heretofore filed herein and reported in 48 Wn.2d 264, 292 P.2d 1052.

REPORTER'S NOTE

By order of the supreme court dated October 15, 1957, the reporter was directed not to publish any opinion of the supreme court in bound volumes of the Washington Reports while a petition for rehearing is pending, and until after the final determination if a rehearing is granted.

Pursuant to the above order, the opinions in the following cases, which were published in Vol. 150 of the Washington Decisions, have been withheld from publication in the current volume:

No. 34041 In re Leuthold's Estate No. 33869 State v. Hinkley No. 34187 Evans v. Yakima Valley Grape Growers Ass'n No. 34084 King County Employees' Ass'n v. State Employees' Retirement Board No. 34064 In re Grady v. Schneckloth REPORTER

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BRENNER v. J.J. BRENNER OYSTER COMPANY
(Aug 13, 1957)