Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

TROY T. HASTINGS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.

BRETT, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff in error, Troy T. Hastings, defendant below, was charged by information in the District Court of Harmon County, Oklahoma, with the crime of grand larceny, 21 O.S. 1951 § 1704[ 21-1704], after prior conviction of a felony, 21 O.S. 1951 § 51[ 21-51]. He was tried by a jury, convicted, and his punishment assessed by the court at six years confinement in the State Penitentiary. Judgment and sentence were entered accordingly, from which this appeal has been perfected.

The crime alleged to have been committed by the defendant involved the theft of seven automobile and tractor radiators having a value in excess of twenty dollars. The evidence submitted is of a conflicting nature and as such presented a question for the sole determination of the jury. McCormick v. State, Okla. Cr. 279 P.2d 359; Gardner v. State, Okla. Cr. 278 P.2d 249.

This case was set for oral argument on September 4, 1957. No briefs have been filed and no appearance made in support thereof, and the same was accordingly submitted on the record. A painstaking examination of the entire record discloses no fundamental error on the face thereof. It has uniformly been held that under these conditions the judgment and sentence will be affirmed. Curtis v. State, 97 Okla. Cr. 199, 261 P.2d 476; Welborn v. State, 95 Okla. Cr. 130, 240 P.2d 1130.

Affirmed.

POWELL and NIX, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HASTINGS v. STATE
(Sep 25, 1957)