AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Daniel GONZALEZ, doing business as State Taxi Co., Defendant.

RUIZ-NAZARIO, District Judge.

The Government, who is the plaintiff in this action for damages arising out of a traffic accident, has moved the Court to strike defendant's counterclaim for damages arising out of the same accident. The contention is that the Court has no jurisdiction to render an affirmative judgment against the United States on this counterclaim.

With this proposition I disagree. Although the general rule is as stated by the Government, the United States has expressly waived its immunity in tort claims such as the one alleged in the counterclaim. 28 U.S.C.A. § 2674. No purpose would be served by compelling the defendant herein to bring a separate action, under the Federal Tort Claims Act. Congress has consented to damage suits, and this Court has jurisdiction to render an affirmative judgment against the United States on the counterclaim herein. See United States v. Silverton, 1 Cir., 200 F.2d 824 and United States v. Yellow Cab Co., 340 U.S. 543, 71 S.Ct. 399, 95 L.Ed. 523.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

UNITED STATES v. GONZALEZ, (D.P.R. 1957)
(Sep 30, 1957)