AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHARLES HEMLEB, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of a City Magistrate, holding a Court of Special Sessions in the City of New York, Borough of Queens, convicting appellant of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, and sentencing him to pay a fine of $100. The fine was paid. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, information dismissed, and fine remitted. There is no proof in the record that appellant operated the motor vehicle while intoxicated, other than his ambiguous admission, made while intoxicated, that he had been driving the car. In the absence of additional proof as to operation, this conviction may not stand (Code Crim. Pro., § 395; People v. Strauss, 260 App. Div. 880; People v. Cuozzo, 292 N.Y. 85; People v. Shanks, 201 Misc. 511, affd. 279 App. Div. 1082). Nolan, P.J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. HEMLEB
(Oct 14, 1957)