Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MARINUS JOHNSON AND ARLIN DAVIDSON, PLAINTIFFS AND RESPONDENTS, v. JOSEPH KOYLE, DUKE PAGE, AND JOHN DOE SYXETT, DEFENDANTS, DUKE PAGE, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.

McDONOUGH, Chief Justice.

This case was before this court on a former appeal Johnson v. Koyle, 5 Utah 2d 9, 295 P.2d 834 and a decision rendered whereby the case was remanded to the lower court for findings and conclusions not inconsistent with the opinion of this court.

Appellant Page, on this appeal from the judgment below, has filed a brief citing as error the trial court's findings and conclusions of law made pursuant to this court's mandate. In his brief he fails to point out in the record, as required by Rule 75(p), Utah Rules of Civil Procedure, where the evidence may be found to support his contentions. Consequently, we might properly disregard the assignment which deals with the lack of support in the record for the trial court's findings.2

We have, however, examined the record and conclude that the trial court followed the mandate of this court in its decree and in so doing committed no error.

The judgment is affirmed. Costs to respondent.

CROCKETT, WADE, WORTHEN and HENRIOD, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

JOHNSON v. KOYLE
(Nov 2, 1957)