Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN RE LAMKIN.

Certiorari denied.

The judgment below rests on an adequate state ground since petitioner, in filing his application for habeas corpus in the state court, failed to comply with applicable state procedures.

The stay is continued to December 18, 1957, to afford petitioner an opportunity to file application for relief in the appropriate state court, and in event of denial of same in the highest court of the State, to renew in this Court an application for writ of certiorari.

Reported below: 164 Tex.Crim. ___, 301 S.W.2d 922.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied. The judgment below rests on an adequate state ground since petitioner, in filing his application for habeas corpus in the state court, failed to comply with applicable state procedures. See Fox Film Corp. v. Muller, 296 U.S. 207 (1935). The stay heretofore entered is continued through December 18, 1957, to afford petitioner an opportunity to file with due diligence a proper application for relief in the appropriate state court, and in the event of a final denial of same in the highest court of the state, to renew in this Court an application for writ of certiorari. See Tenner v. Dullea, 314 U.S. 692 (1941).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE LAMKIN
(Nov 18, 1957)