AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDMUND V. PICCIOTTI, Appellant.

Order dated April 30, 1956, insofar as it denies the application for a hearing reversed on the law and facts and otherwise order affirmed, and matter remitted to the Monroe County Court for a hearing on the issues. Appeal from order dated November 9, 1956, dismissed as academic. Memorandum: The moving papers set up claims of fraud, deceit and coercion in connection with the defendant's plea of guilty and conviction. In answer, the District Attorney has produced a transcript of the court proceedings upon arraignment, plea and sentence. While this transcript puts in issue the claims of the relator, these claims are not "conclusively refuted by unquestionable documentary proof". ( People v. Richetti, 302 N.Y. 290, 296.) Relator is therefore entitled to a hearing. ( People v. Robson, 285 App. Div. 111 2.) All concur, except Vaughan and Goldman, JJ., who dissent as to the reversal and vote for affirmance of the orders appealed from.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. PICCIOTTI
(Nov 13, 1957)