Appeal from an order granting respondent's motion to restrain the picketing of its premises pendente lite and denying appellants' cross motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. ( Metzger Co. v. Fay, 4 A.D.2d 436.) Palermo v. Motto ( 283 App. Div. 746), relied on by appellants, is readily distinguishable on its facts. Nolan, P.J., Beldock, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur. [ 8 Misc.2d 538.]