Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

ANNA LEVINE, Plaintiff, v. BARNEY LEVINE, Defendant

FREDERICK BACKER, J.

This is a cross motion by plaintiff for leave to enter judgment for arrears of alimony. Objection is made by the defendant that the cross motion is defective by reason that it was not instituted by order to show cause (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1171-b). The defendant moved against plaintiff to modify the judgment. He instituted this motion by his attorney. Plaintiff's cross motion, therefore, served on said attorney, is properly interposed pursuant to section 117 of the Civil Practice Act. It permits a cross motion to be made by the service, at least three days prior to the return of the main motion, of a notice specifying any kind of relief, whether same is responsive or not to the relief requested by the moving party.

The motion to enter judgment is granted. Settle order.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LEVINE v. LEVINE
(Nov 25, 1957)