Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Practice of law — Disbarment proceeding — Nature — Venue — Jurisdiction — Three-judge court — Sections 1, 3 and 4, Article IV, Constitution — Motion for continuance — Discretion of court — Affidavit of bias and prejudice — Time for filing — Effect — Section 18, Article IV, Constitution — Judicial — Powers and jurisdiction — Section 2301.05, Revised Code — Local court adjourned — Actions of nonresident judges — Necessity of mandate upon remand — Nonresident attorney member of committee — Verification of charges — Cross-examination of witnesses — Due process — Fair trial.
Per Curiam.
The appeal as of right herein is dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, BELL, TAFT, MATTHIAS and HERBERT, JJ., concur.